Users persist in risky online habits

Users persist in risky online habits

By David Daw, PC World (US) | Jul 20, 2011

Many users continue to make unsafe transactions over the web--even if they're aware of the danger of such transactions, a new survey from Symantec suggests.

Symantec's product marketing manager, Ryan White, revealed the results of the company's Online Internet Safety Survey in a blog post Friday. White admitted to being somewhat surprised by the results.

"What struck me the most was that in many cases, respondents continued online transactions even when those transactions lacked security cues respondents knew should be there," White wrote, "For example, 80 percent of respondents knew to look for the padlock icon signifying Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) encryption, but only 55 percent said they would abort a transaction if they didn't see it."

The padlock indicator was the most obvious safety signal users chose to ignore, so it's hardly surprising that users also ignored signs such as mismatched domain certificates, and chose to use insecure connections when browsing social media sites. Perhaps the most shocking: a whopping 25 percent of users responded that they had continued an online transaction they knew to be unsafe.

This blasé attitude toward security was even stranger considering the survey respondents were very well-informed about online security. A stunning 97 percent of respondents considered themselves to be either "somewhat" or "extremely" knowledgeable about online security. Respondents also seemed to act more securely in other situations--98 percent of respondents were either "extremely" or "somewhat" concerned about their confidential data when banking.

While White was puzzled by this mismatch, the reasons seem obvious: the sheer number of security precautions we're advised to take online can be exhausting. It's not hard to imagine that ven the most security-conscious user sometimes lets their guard down.

The question, then, is this: what can we do to stay safe? Should we create security tools that are easier to use, so that users are less likely to ignore them? Or is this a problem that can only be solved if users have a better mindset about security? Security education may not be enough if users continue to make unsafe choices--even when they know better.

 

Add comment

Post a Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Verification Code
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
 

knowledge_central_tab

 
 
Knowledge Central
Trusted Mobility Index
The mobile ecosystem of devices, services and networks is at a critical inflection point.While the mobile revolution is unleashing massive opportunities in both emerging and mature economies, it is also increasing in complexity and confusion. The reality is the lightning-fast adoption of powerful, smart devices is outpacing society’s ability to secure them. Today, trust in mobility hangs in the balance.
The state of the Internet, Q4, 2011
Geography appears to play a role in frequency of observed attacks on specific ports. For example, Port 23 (Telnet) is a favorite target for attacks observed to be originating from South Korea and Turkey, where it accounted for more than five times the number of attacks targeting the next most popular port (445 in both countries). Other instances of geography-based port targeting include observed attacks centered on Port 1433 (Microsoft SQL Server) in China and on Port 80 (WWW/HTTP) in Indonesia.
 
 
 
HID Global deploys a centralized, web-based IP access control solution at Fuxi Power Plant
Unable to meet the needs for real-time monitoring with its traditional patrol system, China's Fuxi Power Plant has deployed HID Global's VertX V2000.
StubHub: How to spot fraud before it happens
Whenever a list of log-on credentials is dumped onto the Web, retailers get hit with waves of automated attacks. Here's how ticket marketplace StubHub fights the threat.